Hi again, Hi,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 07:42:10AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 06:11:11AM +0100, nicolas.patr...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Yes. This is completely intended. See the changelog: > > > > So, should we send the bug to openjdk’s maintainer? > > No, obviously not. > > If you actually read what I wrote I said that there is #876051. It'd be > nice if that was fixed, yes, though. > And then LO can remove the conflicts. Just FWIW, 7 and 8 also got commits in their tree [1][2] now to get this fixed. That means I have done https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git/commit/?id=c62dfb89b85116dd73dc8f029fd6f1922fa7e504 If that one's uploaded (and the new openjdk-8, too), this bug can be closed... Regards, Rene [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/2017-November/070662.html [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/2017-November/070663.html
