Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:40:10 +0100 (CET)
with message-id
<1155909828.142540653.1457358010620.javamail.r...@zimbra51-e8.priv.proxad.net>
and subject line Re : Bug #642702 - libreoffice-writer: is no longer able to
select URW Chancery L font
has caused the Debian Bug report #642702,
regarding libreoffice-writer: is no longer able to select URW Chancery L font
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
642702: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642702
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libreoffice-writer
Version: 1:3.4.3-1
Severity: normal
Hi!
Since a recent upgrade (1:3.3.3-4+b1 -> 1:3.4.3-1 , I think), I am
no longer able to select the font named URW Chancery L in lowriter.
The font selector shows URW Bookman L, URW Gothic L, and URW Palladio L,
but *not* URW Chancery L.
It used to be selectable, but this seems to no longer be the case.
I tried the same thing in localc and I experienced the same problem.
However, I am convinced that the font is indeed installed on my box:
$ dpkg -l | grep libgs9-common | cut -c 1-60
ii libgs9-common 9.02~dfsg-3
$ dpkg -L libgs9-common | grep -i urw
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWPalladioL-Roma
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-LighItal
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWPalladioL-Bold
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWGothicL-DemiObli
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWGothicL-Book
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWPalladioL-Ital
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-Ligh
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWPalladioL-BoldItal
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-DemiBold
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWGothicL-Demi
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWGothicL-BookObli
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWBookmanL-DemiBoldItal
/usr/share/ghostscript/9.02/Resource/Font/URWChanceryL-MediItal
Moreover, if I fire up gnumeric, I am able to select all the four
above-mentioned fonts (URW Chancery L included!).
I am therefore under the impression that this is a regression in
libreoffice.
Thanks for your attention: I hope this can be fixed easily.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages libreoffice-writer depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.1-4
ii libicu44 4.4.2-2
ii libreoffice-base-core 1:3.4.3-1
ii libreoffice-core 1:3.4.3-1
ii libstdc++6 4.6.1-4
ii libwpd-0.9-9 0.9.3-1
ii libwpg-0.2-2 0.2.0-4
ii libwps-0.2-2 0.2.2-1
ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-4
ii ure 3.4.3-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3
Versions of packages libreoffice-writer recommends:
ii gcj-4.4-jre [java5-runtime] 4.4.6-10
ii libreoffice-emailmerge 1:3.4.3-1
ii libreoffice-filter-binfilter 1:3.4.3-1
ii libreoffice-java-common 1:3.4.3-1
ii libreoffice-math 1:3.4.3-1
Versions of packages libreoffice-writer suggests:
pn libreoffice-base 1:3.4.3-1
pn libreoffice-gcj <none>
Versions of packages libreoffice-core depends on:
ii fontconfig 2.8.0-3
ii libatk1.0-0 2.0.1-2
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libcairo2 1.10.2-6.1
ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.21.7-2
ii libdb5.1 5.1.25-11
ii libexpat1 2.0.1-7
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3
ii libfreetype6 2.4.6-2
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.1-4
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.24.0-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.28.6-1
ii libgraphite2-2.0.0 1.0.2-1
ii libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 0.10.35-1
ii libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.35-1
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.4-3
ii libhunspell-1.2-0 1.2.14-4
ii libhyphen0 2.7.1-4
ii libice6 2:1.0.7-2
ii libicu44 4.4.2-2
ii libjpeg8 8c-2
ii libmythes-1.2-0 2:1.2.1-1
ii libneon27-gnutls 0.29.6-1
ii libnspr4-0d 4.8.9-1
ii libnss3-1d 3.12.11-3
ii libpango1.0-0 1.28.4-3
ii libpng12-0 1.2.46-3
ii librdf0 1.0.13-3
ii libreoffice-common 1:3.4.3-1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.0-2
ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.0e-2
ii libstdc++6 4.6.1-4
ii libtextcat0 2.2-9
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-1
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.9-2
ii libxext6 2:1.3.0-3
ii libxinerama1 2:1.1.1-3
ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-4
ii libxrandr2 2:1.3.2-2
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.6-2
ii libxslt1.1 1.1.26-8
ii libxt6 1:1.1.1-2
ii ttf-opensymbol 2:2.4.3+LibO3.4.3-1
ii ure 3.4.3-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
The problem is due either to poor installation package
or a particular problem for older version stable
which is no longer supported.
So, this bug is no longer valid.
Regards,
--
Stéphane Aulery
--- End Message ---
