On 2014-04-16 17:55, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:09:19AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 03:41:56PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> With libreoffice in the archive maybe ooeclipseintegration can be removed? >> >> Or updated to a new upstream which supposedly supports LO now... (but TTBOMK >> removes the cpp stuff and I don't want to encourage people to use more Java) > > So, let's remove ooeclipseintegration/exp from the archive?
I would say so ... filing a RM now (s.t. the package doesn't live to its 10th birthday). Andreas
