On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 05:20:51PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: > * Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org) wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 02:42:15AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: > > > I've prepared an NMU for hunspell (versioned as 1.3.2-6.1) and > > > uploaded it to DELAYED/10. > > > > NMUing for a wishlist bug??? > > I've been publishing my plans to debian-devel (see the link in the > original bug report), and there weren't any objections there to the > plan.
And -devel is not a must-read (and too time-consuiming). > > > Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. > > > > Yes, please. inedefinitely. (Or until is is at least important/RC) > > So the reason it's wishlist right now is that automake1.9 is still in > the archive. I can cancel this NMU and wait until automake1.9 is Please do. (Doesn't really mater, though, see below) > removed, upgrade the bug severity to serious and then upload an NMU, > but that seems like a worse order of operations since it leaves > hunspell in a FTBFS state for some amount of time. Then you don't need a NMU because I'd do it then (I hope). Besides that, 99_build_stuff,dpatch actualy is not used so I'll just do a uploading removing that and the build-depends and migrating the whole thing away from dpatch... Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140310111414.gl24...@rene-engelhard.de
