Hi, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:31:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > so I'd like to upload that to unstable (and adapt libreoffice) if it > > happens. > > > > But this problem makes me ask > > > > Q1) does anyone of your programs using libhsqldb-java have the same > > problem? Do we need to wait for them to be patches > > to upload 1.8.1.x? > > > > As you probably noticed, libhsqldb-java is 1.8.x while we have a > > libhsqldb2.0-java in experimental (and there's a 2.2.8 released, which I > > packaged some days ago and is ready to upload here now that I long neglected > > because I didn't care as OOo and LibO *do* need 1.8.x.) > > > > Q2) Would you agree that renaming libhsqldb-java to libhsqldb1.8-java would > > be > > worthwile? We then can upload 2.2.8 as libhsqldb-java. This needs source > > uploads of all the above packages, though. > > > > Q3) Does anyone want to overtake libhsqldb-java (2.x) then? I am only > > interested in 1.8.x for OOo/LO. > > > > Q4) does anyone need 2.0 *and* 2.2 be different? Anything working with 2.0 > > and not 2.2? (Doubt that, but better safe than sorry) - in that case we > > need to have libhsqldb1.8-java, libhsqldb2.0-java and the "new" > > libhsqldb-java) > > And noone except tillea (for debian-med)[1] answered here. pkg-java, > Sebastien?
Two weeks later, and rougly one month before the freeze? PING? Can you (= pkg-java and Sebastien!) please answer? Or is this silent agreement? (If so then please do not complain if a upgrade of libhsqldb-java from 1.8.0.10 to libhsqldb-java 2.2.8 breaks anything - you had advance warning. I *will* do this change - and ake LO use libhsqldb1.8-java *for sure* in the next weeks and libsqldb-java will become 2.2.8. And that upload will directly orphan the package. UNLESS you object) Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120429230901.gg12...@rene-engelhard.de
