tag 642954 + pending Hi, On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:10:29AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > mingw-w64, which is intended to eventually replace mingw32 and the > > Why is it then cllaed w*64*? And why didn't it replace them yet? > Sound like either a broken package name or wishful thinking to me - > or even both,
That said, the "official" complete mingw cross-compilation Linux->Windows attempt at http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html uses mingw-w64: [...] --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=i686-w64-mingw32 [...] Looks sane, then :) Changed it for non-squeeze-backports builds. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111005083217.gc6...@rene-engelhard.de
