On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 03:25:01PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, Hi.
> > is very annoying when editing documents containing lots of and/or big > > images, > > as the first save can take minutes instead of seconds. So the images display > > And why shouldn't a big document with many images not take long to save? Do you have a problem with the word "linked" in the report subject? Duh! > I don't think a comparison 2.4.x -> 3.2.x is fair, really. With what should I compare it then? Don't ever think I will install another version of those huge packages just to have a "fair" comparison! > *If* you find this annoying, why are you sending this here increasing > the bug list until infiinity instead fo directly talking with upstream > where this would get attention? *If* you find this bug report annoying, why don't you clearly tell bug reporters explicitly on the bugs page what your special reporting rules are instead of pissing them off to infinity? Was this just a bad day for you or what? Apparently, according to upstream bug reports, that's not the first time reporters are annoyed with untold/contradictory/heavy reporting rules/processes... > (I can just forward it wwith cut'n'paste, that won't be as much as efficient) Yeah do it then instead of bitching about it, that will be more efficient. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100511144236.gb4...@euphonynet.be
