Hi, On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 12:35:06AM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: > Unfortunately don't have such log. Assuming it was a broken state and > not a failure in preinst, it's supposed now the state should have become > unbroken again?
Well, partly. The extension is registered (though the old version) and assuming the next upgrade works... I'd personally do a install --reinstall, though. > > > changed to a warning or notice if it is. > > > > That#s not a warning of the package, that is unopkg outputting it. > > And of course just doing it as a warning makes no sense. > > (Besides that, asou might have noti8ced, unopkg returns 0 on failure > > anyway, so the postinst didn't actually fail. POS tool.) > > Yep I figured out it was not a package warning, my thinking was more "if > it's harmless why scare user with a big ERROR message?" :) Ah, yeah. But it *is* an error (registering a extension which already is registered of course doesn't work), so... :-) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
