Hi, On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:35:42PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:09:46PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:16:57PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:24:10PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > For now, the iceape-dev package still exists and depends on > > > > xulrunner-dev, > > > > which may provide a smooth upgrade path, and your package may build > > > > properly this way (i.e. a binNMU would work) > > > > > > Actually, not. We even need a patch fixing build with xulrunner 1.9.1 > > > whereas 1.9 works. Not to mention it will expect iceape*.pc, > > > not the one of xulrunner... > > > > Well, most other packages are trying several different pkg-config files, > > so it works for most. > > > > Anyways, as per the xulrunner plan for *lenny*, only plugins and > > extensions for iceape should be building against iceape-dev, and
And OOo contains a mozilla plugin. Probably falls into this category. > > therefore should build perfectly fine with xulrunner-dev, modulo > > the pc check. I really wonder what in OOo fails to build with > > xulrunner-dev. I don't know. I just know it broke. Never tried it myself so far... > Also note that even if iceape 2.0 was providing a non dummy iceape-dev > package, its content would basically be that of xulrunner-dev, as iceape > 2.0 is based on gecko 1.9.1. True, that I know (and was what I meant with warning, too ;)) Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
