# if at all, but this at least is a version which once existed # in contrast to 1:3.0.1-8ubuntu1 found 536643 1:3.0.1-8 thanks
Eduard Grebe wrote: > Package: myspell-en-za > Version: 1:3.0.1-8ubuntu1 WTF? a) This is not Ubuntu b) That version is not anywhere in Debian: r...@mini:~$ rmadison myspell-en-za myspell-en-za | 1:2.4.0-3 | stable | all myspell-en-za | 1:3.1.0-1 | testing | all myspell-en-za | 1:3.1.0-1 | unstable | all please check with 1:3.1.0-1. > This is probably mainly a packaging error, since Commonwealth variants of No, it's obviously not. If you looked at the "source code" we just take the en_ZA.aff which is shipped together with en_ZA.dic. If there is an error, it's in that dictionary in the "code", not in the packaging. > So it is a question of including the latest patched file also in the > myspell-en-za package. Aha. And why am I supposed to do that instead of filing that bug upstream so they fix that for their next release? > Launchpad URL: > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/debian/+source/openoffice.org-dictionaries/+bug/398320 Just that this is irrelevant for Debian. > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 5.0 > APT prefers jaunty-updates > APT policy: (500, 'jaunty-updates'), (500, 'jaunty-security'), (500, > 'jaunty-backports'), (500, 'jaunty') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Ah, right. Reporting Ubuntu bugs on Debian on a package which is not even in Debian. Sure... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
