On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:51:23 Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Con Kolivas wrote: > > Wait. I don't understand how suggesting installing a package from the > > experimental packages is meant to be a solution for the stable > > I didn't. The only thing I did was just to mark it as fixed in the 3.0 > packages. > If you look at the version graph (I fixed the version info right now) you > see it'll still appear as not fixed for stable. > > > release. I have this same problem on 3 standard lenny installations on > > a) This bugs is closed with 3.0.0-1, which is not in experimental anymore, > but followers of it are even in *testing* > b) bugs get closed when the fixed package appears. > It doesn't say that this is fixed in stable but says that it's fixed in > the version it was closed with. It will still appear open for stable. > c) it's not a (release-)critical bug, so I fear I will never get the > approval to fix it in stable - expecially since we don't have a patch but > just know that it works in 3.0.
Thanks for explaining that. That's a massive disappointment because it's an absolute showstopper for oo.o and Japanese word processing. Furthermore, it's purely a debian bug because the oo.o packages don't have this issue, only the debian ones. I guess I have no choice but to break package management and start installing random crap again. -ck -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
