tag 517335 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > it seems like the ogltrans-extension is not built anymore with ooo3 on
> > i386, at least the buildd log shows:
> > checking whether to build the OGLTrans extension... no
> > I'm not sure whether this is intentional or not - the Debian changelog
>
> And debian/rules explicitely says ENABLE_OPENGL=n so it seemed to be
> intentional.
> But to be honest I don't remember why I did that (and as you correctly
> pointed out
> I seemed to miss a changelog entry..)
>
> Will try to find out and also find out whether I can reenable it again.
I seems to have boilded down to 2 or 3 things:
a) it was disabled on amd64 because it crashed there and not on 32bit
b) it seems a mesa update at that time broke it, so it was disabled.
c) it was an extension, and that extension got broken with hughe internal
restructuring in the official OOo3 code
When I do a -ogltrans build with 3.0.1 on sid now I see that it works right
now, though as -2.4.1s -ogltrans was already removed from sid this is regarded
as a NEW package and I don't want to go through NEW with manual approval
taking long at times with the important bugfixes 3.0.1/changes for transitions
will receive.
I'll reenable -ogltrans in the first 3.1 upload unless something serious still
happens here.
What worries me a bit is the generated dependencies:
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.5), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libgl1-mesa-glx | libgl1,
libglu1-mesa | libglu1, libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1), libx11-6, ure (>= 1.4.1), [...]
no version specifiers for the GL/GLU libs...
Thanks for reminding me :)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
