tag 514830 + wontfix # maybe even before, but... close 514830 1:3.0.1-1 thanks
[ why are you constantly stippping 514...@bugs.debian.org from the buglog so that this is not recorded in the buglog? ] Hi, Matthias Klose wrote: > you didn't provide the requested information. if you are not interested in > fixing the bug, [...] Am I missing sometihing or are you just not interested in fixing a bug introduced by a *GCC* update? It's like I would break openoffice.org-voikko [1] and then simply not care about getting it fixed :) > [...] just tag it wontfix and close it. there's no need to blame other > packages. + wontfix/close (imho) makes no sense, you could directly close bogus bugs. If it's a bug it should not be colsed but + wontfix, but the bug still would show up :-( Even in the 3.0.x packages it'll show up in "From other branch bugs" :-(. Not to mention it isn't fixed in stable (thanfully the gcc causing it won't be part of stable, otherwise we'd have serious problems with security updates) Ah, well... :-( Grüße/Regards, René [1] (which actually did happen with 3.0.x) -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
