unmerge 509690 retitle 509690 make Java dependencies more generic (java?-runtime, jre) tag 509690 - moreinfo tag 509690 - wontfix block 509690 by 495876 thanks
Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > I have not encountered others that would not install. OO-3 that I have > > currently installed from Experimental installed just fine and runs without > a > > hitch. Has anything changed radically from 3.0.0.4 to 3.0.1-rc# > > RTF changelog: > > -5 added the following: > > - don't add | java5-runtime to JAVA_RUNTIME_DEPENDS as we don't work > with cacao-oj6 > - add lucene-depends substitution also to binary-arch since openoffice.org > is not Arch: all and it doesn't get the liblucene2-java dep otherwise. > [...] > * debian/control.in: > - conflict against cacao-oj6-jre (closes: #495694) > > So we right now (and that's a bugfix!) don't allow *any* Java 5 > capable JVMs but just those who I know which work. But we of course can instate this when cacao is fixed. Buut until that it's now way to generically depend on java5-runtime unless we want break OOo (see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495876) > Yep. And Sun also does distribute their jre as deb. (afaik, "jre", > which would be a bug in our sun jdk packages to not provide "jre", > or the OOo packages could add a | jre at the end). Still valid. Although I fear that whoever else providing Java (which might not work with OOo) also would provide jre.... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
