Hi, Paolo wrote: > > sorting does not work. Besides that, this BTS is not for bpo stuff. > > sigh - I knew I shoudn't have filed the bug.rep here, pity bpo doesn't tell
Not 100% true. As it also affects the normal packages it's valid to file it here - but then please with a version number also existing in "normal" Debian (easily deducible from the bpo version) > > Kohei already mailed me; but I fear it's now too late to fix that for lenny, > > hu? it's a P1 and won't make it into Debian? after last comment I Kohei told me that it's hard to reproduce... And the problem is that I need approval for *every* change. And it first also sounded that it's not that hard and only occurs in some rare occurances.... > experienced so many instances of this issue that I eventually purged OOo, ... but then reliably. As I wrote in my other mail, though, the fix looks quite small so I'll try to get it in... > > Anyway, the next OOo3 upload will have that fix for sure. > > glad to hear that - but will Etch users benefit from that as well? I might update the backport someday... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
