Il giorno Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:06:21 +0100 Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> David Paleino wrote: > > Package: openoffice.org-gcj > > Severity: grave > > nonsense. Why is it grave? Because access to Java stuff is a bit > slower? Because you need to remove it when upgrading from whatever > earlier version? Then do. [..] No, just because I didn't get the Java stuff to work at all, so I was looking for the cited package, but didn't find it, thus filing the bug. Incidentally, I've been able to make the "Java stuff" work (database connection within OOo Base) > ... > > For unstable (at least at he time you wrote this bug) you are > completely wrong, because 2.3.0.dfsg-1 *has* a -gcj and is in sid (as > you even say below) You're right, sorry, I must have confused with testing (which should, indeed, have a 2.2.1-10 in there). > Grüße/Regards, > René Thank you, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://snipurl.com/qa_page/ : :' : Linuxer #334216 | http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://www.debianizzati.org/ `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
