Hi, jim wrote: > A couple of things I noticed in sid recently, I wonder is this correct? > > (a) there are now packages for gcc-4.1, g++-4.1, gcj-4.1 and gij-4.1
I know. > (b) these provide /usr/bin/java, /usr/bin/javac I know. > (c) gjdoc can be installed separately I know. > Therefore with GCC 4.1, java-gcj-compat may be no longer required, but > gij-4.1 has this issue: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=361942 I am sure it still is. There is/was some interesting problems without it which were the cause we started to use it. Don't remember exactly, though, but giij-4.0 etc. also had those points and it didn't work. > Also it appears java-gcj-compat uses the eclipse compiler for javac, not > gcj? Yes. I btw already test-built it on sparc using the java-gcj-compat-dev from experimental, I am just waiting for it to enter unstable to build sparc with it. Regards, Rene
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
