tag 351359 + pending thanks Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote: > You need that now anyway, even when I do the change. Because if you use -lagg > on Debian you get libagg.a. Which will fail on !i386 if you try to linkl it > nto a shared lib because libagg.a isn't built with -fPIC. You'd need to patch > those apps to use -lagg_pic anyway. -lagg does only work for complete static > libs or appy which may link libagg statically into it. DOH! AFter reading that bug again you want -lagg_pic instead of -lagg given back. Which incidentially does make sense. Sorry, I mixed that up somehow. Yeah, I guess we should give pkg-config give back -lagg_pic as long as we don't have a shared libagg. Thanks for the report ;) Regards, Rene -- .''`. Ren?? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
