Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>>touch debian/stampdir/maintscripts
>>/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules DH_OPTIONS="-Npython-uno
>>-Nopenoffice.org-gcj -Nopenoffice.org-hunspell
>>-Nopenoffice.org-filter-so52 -s" binary-common
>>make[1]: Entering directory
>>`/home/fleury/devel/projects/openoffice/openoffice.org-2.0.1-2'
>>dh_testdir
>>dh_testdir: I have no package to build
>
> Uh, you did add amd64 to Architecture? (set BUILD_AMD64=y and run
> debian/rules control?)
>
> dh-testdir ist right here, it has no package to build because there's no
> package defined to be built on amd64....
Hum, I obviously did it wrong in some way. :-(
Well, I suggest to add the following to debian/rules (or similar):
--- debian/rules 2006-01-10 12:02:31.000000000 +0100
+++ debian/rules-amd64 2006-01-10 18:49:09.000000000 +0100
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@
BUILD_AMD64=y
endif
+ifeq "$(DIST)" "Debian"
+ BUILD_AMD64=y
+endif
+
ifeq "$(ARCH)" "amd64"
BUILD_PYUNO=n
else
> And please stop abusing this bugreport for general amd64 porting issues
> since this bug is fixed already (adding Debians contents to Debian64).
The point of this "wish" (better than bug, I guess) was to have the
src-package to compile for AMD64. The last patch included in this mail
(look-up) should be the final one. I had a full building process to
complete.
You can close this bug.
Thanks a lot for your help (Martin and Rene).
Regards
--
Emmanuel Fleury
C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder,
but when you do, it blows away your whole leg.
-- Bjarne Stroustrup
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
