Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:20:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed already
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2005 14:20:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 06:20:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pelican.sc3d.org ([216.184.201.86])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbIiN-000101-Ad
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 06:20:15 -0800
Received: from mnemosyne ([212.69.49.49])
by pelican.sc3d.org (pf ESMTP spamd IP-based SPAM blocker) with ASMTP
id FIA74758
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:20:14 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org-debian-files: oowriter filename completion fails on
files
containing spaces
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:19:57 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.1.3-8+1
Severity: normal
Given a file called "THIS IS A WORD FILE.doc", typing
oowriter THIS<TAB>
with bash completion active results in a display:
A FILE.doc IS THIS WORD
as if there are several different files. With ls, or other commands,
filename completion works properly.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages openoffice.org-debian-files depends on:
ii debianutils 2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii openoffice.org 1.1.3-9 high-quality office productivity s
ii openoffice.org-bin 1.1.3-9 OpenOffice.org office suite binary
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338876-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2005 18:22:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 10:22:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20])
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbMUt-0005QE-4C
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 10:22:35 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2005 18:21:09 -0000
Received: from dslb-084-056-067-094.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost)
[84.56.67.94]
by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 13 Nov 2005 19:21:09 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3F0716A1CE; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:20:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:20:53 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed already
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+QahgC5+KEYLbs62"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Organization: The Debian Project
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--+QahgC5+KEYLbs62
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Version: 1.1.4-5+1
Hi,
would you please look whether bugs already were reported? The (still
visible) #303578 dealed with exactly this problem and was fixed
already....
That sarge does have this bug is another matter but it's fixed in
testing and unstable.
Closing for testing/unstable.
Regards,
Rene
--+QahgC5+KEYLbs62
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDd4QE+FmQsCSK63MRAqQeAJ476XybrDsSRFspQnozgpL4F9F4zACfdwDQ
toNLE8dbYjnTaNXx0JEbOKY=
=WZ8D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+QahgC5+KEYLbs62--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
