Your message dated Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line the bug was shfs's problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2004 15:55:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 15 08:55:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail6.bluewin.ch [195.186.4.229] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BE9DX-00007f-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:55:55 -0700
Received: from localhost (195.186.144.234) by mail6.bluewin.ch (Bluewin AG 
7.0.027)
        id 4055A1BD004FDF1B; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:55:24 +0000
Received: from tpo by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BE9D1-0006bI-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:55:23 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: save reports "The operation on /some/path/doc.swx was started with an
 invalid parameter"
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:55:23 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: minor

After saving a file on a SHFS mounted filesystem I get the error
mentioned above. This did not happen in open office 1.1.0-6 from which I
upgraded.
*t

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages openoffice.org-bin depends on:
ii  debconf                     1.4.21       Debian configuration management sy
ii  libart-2.0-2                2.3.16-3     Library of functions for 2D graphi
hi  libaudio2                   1.6c-3       The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcurl2                    7.11.1-1     Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libdb3++c102                3.2.9-19     Berkeley v3 Database Libraries for
hi  libfontconfig1              2.2.2-1      generic font configuration library
hi  libfreetype6                2.1.7-2      FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.3.3-6    GCC support library
ii  libice6                     4.3.0-7      Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libmyspell3                 1:3.1-5      MySpell spellchecking library
ii  libsm6                      4.3.0-7      X Window System Session Management
hi  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.3-6    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6                    4.3.0-7      X Window System protocol client li
hi  libxaw7                     4.3.0-7      X Athena widget set library
ii  libxext6                    4.3.0-7      X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxt6                      4.3.0-7      X Toolkit Intrinsics
hi  openoffice.org              1.1.1-1      high-quality office productivity s
ii  xlibs                       4.3.0-7      X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-5    compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
* openoffice.org-bin/prelink: false

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 243925-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2004 13:48:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 08 06:48:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail3.bluewin.ch [195.186.1.75] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BXgxO-00045v-00; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 06:48:02 -0700
Received: from localhost (62.203.49.219) by mail3.bluewin.ch (Bluewin AG 
7.0.028)
        id 40A4696300327C2D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:47:31 
+0000
Received: from tpo (helo=localhost)
        by localhost with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BXgwt-0004SP-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 15:47:31 +0200
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: the bug was shfs's problem
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

so I'm closing the bug

Reply via email to