On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 04:55, Rene Engelhard wrote: > well, we could come out without gimp-perl. We could "fix" that bug we > now have. But I wouldn't 100% like this and I moreover I would not like > removing gimp-perl although I never used it except for this conversions > we do in the OOo package now.
I think we should use script-fu directly. The script is not complicated and then we only need the gimp itself. Chris
