Your message dated Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:21:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231251: openoffice.org: manifest does not match
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2004 12:04:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 05 04:04:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AoiEn-0002jf-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 04:04:05 -0800
Received: from bsn-77-89-196.dsl.siol.net ([192.168.50.1]) [193.77.89.196]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AoiEm-0008SR-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 06:04:04 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Primoz Bratanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org: manifest does not match
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.41
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 13:04:02 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,OUR_MTA_MSGID,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.0-5
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
# Remove copy of libstdc++ since we do not use it
rm -f
/root/dosezki/openoffice.org-1.1.0/debian/tmp//usr/lib/openoffice/program/libstdc++*
# Check that setup really did something
[ -f
/root/dosezki/openoffice.org-1.1.0/debian/tmp//usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
]
touch debian/stampdir/setup
dh_testdir
umask 022
# compare manifests
find debian/tmp \( -type f -o -type l \) \
! -path 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/openoffice/program/python-core*' \
| LC_ALL=C sort | cut -c12- > debian/MANIFEST.i386.new
# confirm that the installed file list has not changed
if [ -e debian/MANIFEST.i386 ]; then \
if ! cmp -s debian/MANIFEST.i386 debian/MANIFEST.i386.new; then \
diff -U0 debian/MANIFEST.i386 debian/MANIFEST.i386.new; \
if [ -n "$IGNORE_MANIFEST_CHANGES" ]; then \
echo 'MANIFEST check failed; ignoring problem because
\$IGNORE_MANIFEST_CHANGES set' >&2; \
echo 'Please ensure that the package maintainer has an up-to-date
version of the' >&2; \
echo 'MANIFEST.i386 file.' >&2; \
else \
echo 'MANIFEST check failed; please see debian/README' >&2; \
exit 1; \
fi; \
fi; \
fi;
- --- debian/MANIFEST.i386 2004-02-04 02:28:36.000000000 +0100
+++ debian/MANIFEST.i386.new 2004-02-05 05:56:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -3588,0 +3589 @@
+usr/lib/openoffice/share/gallery/htmltheme.orig
MANIFEST check failed; please see debian/README
make: *** [debian/stampdir/manifest] Error 1
No changes.. just debootstrap; install build-essential; build-dep;
dpkg-buildpackage
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.0-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sl_SI.UTF-8
Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii debianutils 2.6.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dictionaries-common 0.16.3 Common utilities for spelling dict
ii openoffice.org-bin 1.1.0-5 OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.0-5+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.0-5 English (US) language package for
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAIjEyHOuqnSwJthERAn6EAKCuopfRhSaanStQsS7K65r5rx6aKwCgl60s
sypEKvxpmoaUcjnsKJ78MHg=
=H3Mp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 231251-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 16:21:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 08:21:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from stan.ping.de [62.72.95.4] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ap8jj-0007V6-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:21:47 -0800
Received: from rene by stan.ping.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ap8jh-00056l-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:21:45 +0100
X-IMAP-Sender: rene
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:21:16 +0100
X-OfflineIMAP-105991976-52656d6f7465-494e424f582e4f7574626f78:
1076084504-0863053741967
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#231251: openoffice.org: manifest does not match
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
--St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Primoz wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 15:37, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > I've just running a build and I bet that that failure won't happen
> > here...
>=20
> I don't care... as long as I'll manage to build this packet with
> Slovenian language (but it has to build without modifications first).
Ah. So it's not the original 1.1.0-5. Closing.
BTW; Patches for sloevian? We could include it in the official package..
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAI777+FmQsCSK63MRApexAJ92ybAuGiGPkFEg02vJnYxn47hp5ACcDLar
0bVwJsUN/3+9rXxGLbTSFZ8=
=Zep4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13--
