Your message dated Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:18:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218576: Mistake in dependencies for
openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2003 11:35:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 01 05:35:52 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from infofin.com [209.61.158.139]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AFsv4-0001Tr-00; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 04:23:46 -0600
Received: (qmail 11242 invoked by uid 89); 1 Nov 2003 10:23:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sanna.igidr.ac.in) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by 0 with SMTP; 1 Nov 2003 10:23:45 -0000
Received: from ajayshah by sanna.igidr.ac.in with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AFsv4-0002nO-00; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 15:53:46 +0530
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 15:53:46 +0530
From: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mistake in dependencies for openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.34
Organisation: Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_31
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: normal
I look at openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw --
Package: openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw
Description: Chinese Traditional language package for openoffice.org
OpenOffice is a complete modern office suite, licensed under the GPL,
with features comparable to Microsoft(R) Office features.
.
This package contains the localization of openoffice.org 1.1 in
Chinese Traditional.
I don't want any Chinese on my machine. So I do:
[ sanna ~ ] sudo apt-get --purge remove openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw
Password:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
openoffice.org* openoffice.org-bin* openoffice.org-debian-files*
openoffice.org-help-en* openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us*
openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 6 to remove and 256 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 205MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
Abort.
This suggests that the dependencies are wrong?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sanna 2.4.17 #2 Sun Feb 10 18:45:12 IST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii dictionaries-common 0.15.5 Common utilities for spelling dict
ii openoffice.org-bin 1.1.0-1 OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.0-1+2 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw [op 1.1.0-2 Chinese Traditional language packa
-- no debconf information
--
Ajay Shah Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of Economic Affairs
http://www.mayin.org/ajayshah Ministry of Finance, New Delhi
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 218576-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2003 09:18:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 14 03:18:27 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (rover24.cmt) [62.138.132.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AKa5z-0007r9-00; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 03:18:27 -0600
Received: from scooby.cmt (scooby [192.168.60.70])
by rover24.cmt (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9A2C7A21
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:18:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by scooby.cmt (Postfix, from userid 1050)
id 97B6B3B75F; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:18:35 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Bug#218576: Mistake in dependencies for
openoffice.org-l10n-zh-tw
From: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:18:35 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 09:30, Chris Halls wrote:
> BTW, I actually tried this out on my pure unstable chroot, and I do not
> get the same as youi, with apt or aptitude:
>
> # dpkg -l openoffice.org\*
> No packages found matching openoffice.org*.
>
> # apt-get install openoffice.org
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> dictionaries-common openoffice.org-bin openoffice.org-debian-files
> openoffice.org-l10n-en
> Note that in both cases, I would end up with openoffice.org-l10n-en.
No further response; I guess this is no longer a bug in current
unstable. Closing bug.
Thanks,
Chris
