Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:16:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195936: no response from submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jun 2003 14:10:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 03 09:10:30 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host.220.247.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com (smtp.insia.org) 
[62.23.247.220] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19NCUe-0005rb-00; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 09:10:28 -0500
Received: by smtp.insia.org (Postfix, from userid 1349)
        id 78D101B00E; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 16:10:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wedge.insia.org (wedge.insia.org [10.42.40.1])
        by smtp.insia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id D140F1B00C; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 16:10:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wedge.insia.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id CCD4918252C; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 16:10:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Emmanuel le Chevoir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: oooqs-kde: OOo doesn't see truetype fonts anymore when used with oooqs
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 16:10:27 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sanitizer: Systeme de filtrage mail - INSIA
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_01,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: oooqs-kde
Version: 1.0rc3-2
Severity: important

When I run oowriter from oooqs, it does not see any truetype font
anymore, and font antialiasing doesn't work.
When I run it directly, with oooqs unloaded, everything goes well and my
TT fonts are there, antialiased again.

I use defoma along with x-ttcidfont-conf, as stated in OO.o
README.Debian. I tried to launch oooqs with then environment variable 
GDK_USE_XFT set to 1, it changes nothing.

It looked briefly at the sources, and thought this was caused by oooqs
executing the wrong script (ie not the debian wrapper), but actually,
05_run_wrapper_not_soffice.dpatch seems to do exactly this. This is a
bit puzzling...


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wedge 2.4.20-pre11+acpi #4 Tue Oct 29 15:09:09 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages oooqs-kde depends on:
ii  kdelibs4                      4:3.1.2-2  KDE core libraries
ii  libart-2.0-2                  2.3.12-1   Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-17   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0c102                   2.6.10-1   client library to control the FAM 
ii  libgcc1                       1:3.3-2    GCC support library
ii  libpng12-0                    1.2.5.0-3  PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt                 3:3.1.1-8  Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libstdc++5                    1:3.3-2    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  openoffice.org                1.0.3-2    high-quality office productivity s
ii  xlibs                         4.3.0-0ds4 X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                        1:1.1.4-12 compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 195936-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2003 14:16:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 10 08:16:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (rover24.cmt) [62.138.132.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AJCqS-00074Y-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:16:45 -0600
Received: from shawn (unknown [192.168.60.57])
        by rover24.cmt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FE4C7A25
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:16:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: by shawn (Postfix, from userid 1050)
        id 39DDFA47; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:16:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:16:42 +0100
From: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#195936: no response from submitter
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_60,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 11:04:51PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> does this still happen with the newly uploaded
> openoffice.org_1.0.99+1.1rc which entered unstable?

No response from submitter since August, closing bug.

Chris

Reply via email to