Your message dated Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:16:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181717: UI fonts are missing again in OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 
- fixed in 1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2003 04:19:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 19 22:19:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18liBC-0002Im-00; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:19:26 -0600
Received: from pcp818856pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net
 (pcp818856pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net [68.50.47.83])
 by mtaout02.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.09 (built Jan
 7 2003)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:18:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:17:38 -0500
From: Andrew Schulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: UI fonts are missing again in OpenOffice.org 1.0.2
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.2

I'm following up on bug #172448.  According to the bug report log, the missing 
UI fonts were considered to be restored and the problem resolved as of 
openoffice.org 1.0.1-7.  But I'm running version 1.0.2, in unstable, and the 
UI fonts are gone-- no characters appear in the UI.  Document fonts are 
intact.

Unfortunately my installation is a mix of stable, testing, and unstable.  A 
likely suspect :(

% ldd /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin
        libsvl641li.so => not found
        libvcl641li.so => not found
        libcppu.so.3 => not found
        libcppuhelper3gcc3.so => not found
        libtl641li.so => not found
        libvos2gcc3.so => not found
        libsal.so.3 => not found
        libutl641li.so => not found
        libucbhelper1gcc3.so => not found
        libcomphelp2.so => not found
        libsalhelper3gcc3.so => not found
        libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x40021000)
        libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x4002f000)
        libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x40037000)
        libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x4004d000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40107000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4010a000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40159000)
        libstlport_gcc.so.4.5 => /usr/lib/libstlport_gcc.so.4.5 (0x4017b000)
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x40234000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x402dd000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x403ed000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

% cat /etc/ld.so.conf
/usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d
/usr/X11R6/lib
/usr/local/lib
/usr/lib/libc5-compat
/lib/libc5-compat
/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/lib
/usr/lib/wine
% uname -a
Linux arsenic 2.4.18 #2 Mon Nov 18 22:50:31 EST 2002 i686 Pentium III (Katmai) 
GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
% ls -l /lib/libc.so.6  
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           13 Feb 19 21:40 /lib/libc.so.6 -> 
libc-2.3.1.so

Please let me know what other information I can provide to help solve this 
problem.

Andrew Schulman.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181717-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2003 10:16:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 08 05:16:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (rover24.cmt) [62.138.132.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1A7BMY-000083-00; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 05:16:10 -0500
Received: from shawn (unknown [192.168.60.57])
        by rover24.cmt (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC18BC79F3
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,  8 Oct 2003 12:16:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by shawn (Postfix, from userid 1050)
        id 7D760B26; Wed,  8 Oct 2003 12:16:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:16:08 +0200
From: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#181717: UI fonts are missing again in OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 - 
fixed in 1.1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
        tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:17:38PM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1.0.2
>=20
> I'm following up on bug #172448.  According to the bug report log, the mi=
ssing=20
> UI fonts were considered to be restored and the problem resolved as of=20
> openoffice.org 1.0.1-7.  But I'm running version 1.0.2, in unstable, and =
the=20
> UI fonts are gone-- no characters appear in the UI.  Document fonts are=
=20
> intact.

Hi Andrew, sorry for leaving this report untouched for so long.  1.1.0 uses
fontconfig and has many font bugfixes.  There are no known problems with
missing UI fonts any more; please reopen if you can reproduce this in any
way using 1.1.0.

Thanks,
Chris

--VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/g+PoexmdExmX588RAhyVAJwOaeBZjO28frjvkF88sqUsO+vl2wCgwgPt
v+RRoAfENHpwtoDZDODwfWo=
=OpBB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM--

Reply via email to