----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
pipe to |procmail -p -m /org/bugs.debian.org/mail/.procmailrc
generated by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pipe delivery process timed out
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (rover24.cmt) [62.138.132.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A40UM-00043X-00; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:03:06 -0500
Received: from shawn (unknown [192.168.60.57])
by rover24.cmt (Postfix) with ESMTP
id F1D8AC79F3; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:03:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by shawn (Postfix, from userid 1050)
id 70904EC6; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:02:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:02:58 +0200
From: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#211288: Updated patches to build RC5 without a JDK
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XF85m9dhOBO43t/C"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
--XF85m9dhOBO43t/C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Josh,
I'd like to freeze the packages for the rc5 release, and then get your
patches in at the start of the next cycle.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 11:21:38AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> I also added support in the Debian packaging to optionally build with a
> JDK (based on the optional Mozilla support), if DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains
> jdkhome=3D/absolute/path/to/jdk. =20
That's great.
> If there are no problems with these patches, I will commit the ooo-build
> work to CVS as soon as my JCA is listed on
> www.openoffice.org/copyright/copyrightapproved.html .
As long as you have already sent off your JCA we'll accept your work while
the approval is pending, since it may take a week or two to be processed.
> The packages built sucessfully, but the MANIFEST check failed due to
> changes in the new Ximian icon set and to RC5 shipping pyuno and the
> internal python by default.
That's fine. The MANIFEST check is more of a sanity check for the official
builds and to help track changes in the OOo build system. Although it would
be nice to be able to check all possible filesets generated by the packages,
it isn't a necessary part of the packaging and ignoring them is fine.
> --- debian.orig/rules 2003-09-27 12:01:26.000000000 -0700
> +++ debian/rules 2003-09-27 11:58:02.000000000 -0700
[...]
> @@ -726,6 +743,47 @@
> +# If building with a JDK, install the additional files
> +ifeq "$(USE_JAVA)" "y"
> +ifeq "$(ARCH)" "i386"
> + LIBSUFFIX=3Di
> +endif
> +ifeq "$(ARCH)" "powerpc"
> + LIBSUFFIX=3Dp
> +endif
> +ifeq "$(ARCH)" "s390"
> + LIBSUFFIX=3D3
> +endif
> +ifeq "$(LIBSUFFIX)" ""
> + echo 'LIBSUFFIX unknown for $(ARCH).' >&2
> + exit 1
> +endif
You could place a LIBSUFFIX=3D line in debianscripts/vars.<arch> instead of
needing multiple ifs here.
Thanks,
Chris
--XF85m9dhOBO43t/C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/eFeyexmdExmX588RAm7DAJ9F4fsazN1nwv7F/XMCvD+vAX4WpwCgnVEJ
Pk/DTjb8BoDtSkdFV4pJUho=
=/j0D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--XF85m9dhOBO43t/C--
----- End forwarded message -----
--
