Your message dated Sun, 7 Sep 2003 17:43:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2003 22:39:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 20 17:39:33 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.0.188]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19pbc5-0006UF-00; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:39:33 -0500
Received: from llhosts (p508BB0A1.dip.t-dialin.net [80.139.176.161])
(authenticated bits=0)
by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7KMdOG1016097;
Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:39:29 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: Broken Package "openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de" in SID
From: Clemens Bier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-37dsRQkPvVkWKZFoG3jM"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:39:44 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.2 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
RCVD_IN_NJABL,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--=-37dsRQkPvVkWKZFoG3jM
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
Version: 20020701-6
Package is not installable in SID.=20
Depite a higher version number of the currently available version of the
"openoffice.org" package, the package complains about an unmet
dependency.
zappa:/home/clemens# apt-get install openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de: Depends: openoffice.org (>=3D
1.0.0-pre1.0.1rc1) but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages
zappa:/home/clemens# apt-cache policy openoffice.org
openoffice.org:
Installed: 1.0.99+1.1rc-1
Candidate: 1.0.99+1.1rc-1
Version Table:
*** 1.0.99+1.1rc-1 0
500 http://192.168.2.20 sid/contrib Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.0/SID , kernel 2.4.21-4-k7 and lib6
Version: 2.3.2-2.
Regards,
Clemens Bier
--=-37dsRQkPvVkWKZFoG3jM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA/Q/iwh/81iaB9DRsRArBlAJ93bo1Gth5H1lCqGdfeaDxZE1ewRwCcD+fv
tPBmafJZw/thlk1M9hKv/hk=
=x0d7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-37dsRQkPvVkWKZFoG3jM--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 206473-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2003 15:44:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 07 10:44:36 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.250]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19w1iO-0005LT-00; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 10:44:36 -0500
Received: from [212.227.126.220] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19w1iN-0006vq-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 17:44:35 +0200
Received: from [80.146.37.166] (helo=frodo)
by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19w1iN-0003s1-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 17:44:35 +0200
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6ADE46245A; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 17:43:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 17:43:41 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: package removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=4.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,RCVD_IN_NJABL,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
as mentioned already, myspell-* is now accepted in unstable and
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de* is now removed from unstable.
Therefore closing this bug.
--- snip ---
=46rom: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.39 $=20
Subject: Bug#209049: fixed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 10:49:20 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de | 20020701-6 | source
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at | 20020701-6 | all
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-ch | 20020701-6 | all
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de | 20020701-6 | all
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.
--- snip ---
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/W1Is+FmQsCSK63MRAov0AJ41oNuLdTlaXQHMW/kSqDwKorcr4gCbB5ia
b6cmFyAoiKEk6QvSCMVZveE=
=NHH8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8--
