Hi Jim,
I saw in bonsai, the Heiner did a resync of rc3 a few days ago, to get
the latest fixes from other cws for 1.1. It is a good idea, to do a
build depend=t first, after a big cvs update has been done before. since
the generation of dependencies is a quite time consuming action, it
might not a good idea to do so in any case, but for safety reasons it is
very recommended.
Martin
Jim Watson wrote:
condition.hxx has been moved away from unotools, but these files still held a
reference to the old file locations
unotools/unxlngs.pro/misc/s_condition.dpcc
unotools/unxlngs.pro/misc/s_ucblockbytes.dpcc
mine are gone now but kfind remembers the second one held a line like this
../../unxlngs.pro/slo/ucblockbytes.obj ../../inc/unotools/condition.hxx
i am not sure what the issue is here...is it that something in the makefiles
needs to refresh these files when anything else has changed?
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 20:34, Jim Watson wrote:
doing build --all after a cvs update today i got this :(
/usr/local/oo_src/unotools/source/ucbhelper
dmake: Error -- `../../inc/unotools/condition.hxx' not found, and can't be
made
---* TG_SLO.MK *---
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/local/oo_src/unotools/source/ucbhelper
this is due to some things that have been moved from here a couple of days
ago...
anyway i got unotools to build OK by:
cd unotools
rm -r un*
build
deliver
jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
