On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 02:08, James D Strandboge wrote: > On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 17:37, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Yuhanes Tjandra wrote: > > > I have a problem, which was probably the most FAQ in the users list in > > > couple of months ago. > > > > And it is. > > > > And if you have has read the archives of this mailinglist, you would > > have seen much much answers on thaz topic.... > > > > > contrib. The problem is unmatched version used in both packages. > > > Gnome2.2 requires libfreetype6 2.1.3-10woody1, while openoffice.org > > > libfreetype6 < 2.1.0 > > [...] > > > Can we have the same version of libfreetype6? I know it is the risk to > > > run a mixed system. > > > > No and exactly. The packages are compiled on woody which has 2.0.9. > > Unfortunately libfreetype6 2.0.9 is incompatible with libfreetype6 >= 2.1.0, > > so we need to enfore this dependency. > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2003/debian-openoffice-200303/msg00041.html > > lists two possibilities what you can do... > > > > As it seems you would keep your GNOME 2.2 backport, you only have option > > Actually there is another openoffice available for woody based on this > semi-official release, that is compatible with gnome 2.2. Get it from > here: > > deb http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/debian woody/bunk-1 main contrib non-free > > See notes at: > http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/packages
Ok... thanks guys for the answer. -- Yuhanes Tjandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
