Hmmm .. anyone can say something about the status?
regards
Jan
----- Forwarded message from Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:25:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: OpenOffice Build <dev@tools.openoffice.org> cc: dev@openoffice.org, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [tools-dev] Re: [dev] Re: [tools-dev] GPC inclusion ... On 5 Sep 2002, Michael Meeks wrote: > > We *do* ship with GPC enabled, as the author gave us his "express > > consent". > > Ah; apologies - skimped research there; just assumed RedHat had pinched > your spec-file whole. Red Hat specfile is neither a superset nor a subset of MDK specfile. It's simply a fork that evolved in their way. > > I believe Debian people were working on a GPC replacement. > > Ken ? I think Chris and JH followed that. Chris? ----- End forwarded message ----- -- .''`. Jan-Hendrik Palic | : :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,.. `. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` ` `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ' ` `
pgpEcrJAL0mAf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
