+++ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer [2012-12-17 14:11 -0300]: > On Sun 16 Dec 2012 09:03:14 Paul Wise escribió: > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > > > Is that a real problem, from a Debian point of view? Aren't we entering > > > a phase of multiple display management choices anyway, with Wayland > > > coming along? I would have thought that direct framebuffer access, with > > > a complementary window management model, was an equally valid choice as > > > using either X or Wayland. > > > > For Debian thats fine, for me personally there are too many apps and > > toolkits that don't support anything other than X11. GTK+ for instance > > has dropped DirectFB support. > > In the case of Qt4, and if I'm not mistaken, frambebuffer support would mean > a > parallel build of Qt. Doesn't sounds too promising :-/
Yes, but this isn't the only environment/application/set of packages that would find a QT-embedded build useful. QT having a less monlithic build process would help a lot here, which I understand there is onlgoing work on? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
