I maintain a new package, licenseutils, for witch I had a very bad response from buildd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=licenseutils&suite=sid
Seems that different architectures have different symbols. So I'm looking for a way to address this issue. As dh_makeshlibs(1) states if I need to provide different symbols file for different architectures I have to append $arch at the end of the file name, but in this way I have to ship 12 symbols files! Doesn't seem a very clean solution to me. Anybody has a better solution than mine? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB more about me: http://mapreri.org Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri Ubuntu Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MattiaRizzolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAHKYmeu8j4=uqu72kh8mg1jpnwfvmvsn4f2nkfl5sxw9e5x...@mail.gmail.com
