On 04/12/2018 05:10 PM, Steffen Möller wrote: > This was still open on my desk - sorry for the late reply. > > On 4/10/18 6:09 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:25:52PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >>> >>> An immediate concern of mine is that we have no visibility of our >>> task page with Google. A strategic mistake apparently was >>> to have the actuall RRID hidden in the URL rather than having printed >>> it flat out in the task description. I thought this was enough to >>> have the page found while not dominating e.g. the package's description >>> in the tracker. >> Can you please give an example? I do not understand what you prefer >> over what we just have. > > Instead of <a href="identifier.org/..RRID:SCR_...">SciCrunch</a> it > could be <a href="the same">RRID:SCR_..</a>. >
may be interesting to set: <a href="the same"><cite>RRID:SCR_..</cite></a> cite is a metadata HTML standard that may be supported/analysed by google and co (https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Web/HTML/Element/cite) > Location-wise maybe with the green area would be nicer. I am not sure > if the problem google has with our page is not also of some other > nature, though. The current page header of that page is lacking a > description. Not being an expert in search-engine optimisation, I just > iterated through > https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/79812?hl=en and did not > find much else to add, really. Suggestions: > > <meta name="description" content="List of packages in the Debian Linux > distribution curated by the ${preprety:blend or whatever} community. > Here shown the subset of packages ${task description}." /> > > Maybe you (or some SEO pro on this list) find some more bits > >> As a totally unrelated note: I have the feeling that seeking for Debian >> relevant things (for instance in our mailing lists) became not as >> successful as it was some years ago. I'm more and more falling back to >> seeking in my private mail archive using notmuch. > > Well, all this RRID stuff to me is a prelude to help automating > workflow environments. If we are not biological, then there is not too > much to discuss, we just need someone to do the work ;) > >>> While googling around I was pointed to this list of what the authors >>> considered common software in bioinformatics at >>> ftp://penguin.genomics.cn/pub/10.5524/RRID/RRIDlist.pdf >> Interesting list. Do you have some suggestion what to do with it? > > Nothing. It just kind of helps to assess where we are. We have a good > coverage of that list. Not perfect, but good, i.e. good enough to come > up with a series of workflow descriptions. > > Steffen > > > -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
