debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Paul Wise
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Paul Wise
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? John Thorvald Wodder II
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Paul Wise
  • Re: License violations for dependencies of Rust and Go programs? Florian Weimer
• Optymalizacja kosztów marketingu Wioletta Sadownik
• NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Marius Gripsgard
  • Re: NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Sam Hartman
  • Re: NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Paul Wise
  • Re: NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Paul Wise
  • Re: NetData violating DFSG, nonfree? Paul Wise
• Re: Re: Here manuel
• BSD-3-Clause-Attribution GPL Compatibility Richard Laager
  • Re: BSD-3-Clause-Attribution GPL Compatibility Sam Hartman
• SWIFTStandards IPR Policy Mathias Behrle
  • Re: SWIFTStandards IPR Policy Walter Landry
  • Re: SWIFTStandards IPR Policy Mathias Behrle
• mini-httpd NCSA license Alexandru Mihail
  • Re: mini-httpd NCSA license Richard Laager
• Nethack General Public License Joshua Allen
  • Re: Nethack General Public License MJ Ray
• mini-httpd NCSA license concerns Alexandru Mihail
• advice on non-free NXP Software License Agreement Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Re: advice on non-free NXP Software License Agreement Sam Hartman
  • Re: advice on non-free NXP Software License Agreement Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Re: advice on non-free NXP Software License Agreement Sam Hartman
• Possible GPL violation Joshua Allen
  • Re: Possible GPL violation Daniel Hakimi
• Expat license and "free for academic users" Andrius Merkys
  • Re: Expat license and "free for academic users" Francesco Poli
  • Re: Expat license and "free for academic users" Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Expat license and "free for academic users" Sam Hartman
  • Re: Expat license and "free for academic users" Andrius Merkys
• Fonts that must be purchased - nonfree? Bagas Sanjaya
  • Re: Fonts that must be purchased - nonfree? Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Fonts that must be purchased - nonfree? Bagas Sanjaya
  • Re: Fonts that must be purchased - nonfree? Jonathan Carter
  • Re: Fonts that must be purchased - nonfree? Bagas Sanjaya
  • Re: Fonts that must be purchased - nonfree? Jonathan Carter
  • Re: Fonts that must be purchased - nonfree? Bagas Sanjaya
  • Re: Fonts that must be purchased - nonfree? Sebastian Crane
  • Re: Fonts that must be purchased - nonfree? Andrew M.A. Cater
• python-sepaxml questions matthias . geiger1024
  • Re: python-sepaxml questions Paul Wise
  • Re: python-sepaxml questions Paul Wise
  • Re: python-sepaxml questions Paul Wise
• About distribution of modified copy of Debian OS Borja Sanchez
  • Re: About distribution of modified copy of Debian OS Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: About distribution of modified copy of Debian OS Borja Sanchez
  • Re: About distribution of modified copy of Debian OS Andrew M.A. Cater
• Re: Brief update about software freedom and artificial intelligence Daniel Lange
  • Re: Brief update about software freedom and artificial intelligence Russ Allbery
• Is GeneralUser soundfont's license suitable for Debian main? undef
  • Re: Is GeneralUser soundfont's license suitable for Debian main? Paul Wise
  • Re: Is GeneralUser soundfont's license suitable for Debian main? undef
  • Re: Is GeneralUser soundfont's license suitable for Debian main? Paul Wise
• Bug#1003044: internal 'getzoneinfofile_stream' method emits a warning message James Addison
• v2ray geoip data has problemic license linsui
• Pracownik na produkcję Adam Moskalik
• Fw: Re: [Emc-developers] Bug#1030304: Licensing & copyright issues Adam Ant
• Re: Bug#1029842: ITP: randombytes -- Library generating fresh randomness Sam Hartman
  • Re: Bug#1029842: ITP: randombytes -- Library generating fresh randomness Jan Mojzis
  • Re: Bug#1029842: ITP: randombytes -- Library generating fresh randomness Sam Hartman
  • Re: Bug#1029842: ITP: randombytes -- Library generating fresh randomness Simon Josefsson
• Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Axel Beckert
  • Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Richard Fontana
  • Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Soren Stoutner
• License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar Helmar Gerloni
  • Re: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar Roberto
  • Re: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar Helmar Gerloni
  • Re: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar tony mancill
  • Re: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar tony mancill
• RFC about DFSG-freeness of PHP license [Re: Bug#903999: ITP: php-doc -- Documentation for PHP] Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: RFC about DFSG-freeness of PHP license [Re: Bug#903999: ITP: php-doc -- Documentation for PHP] Athos Ribeiro
  • Re: Bug#903999: RFC about DFSG-freeness of PHP license [Re: Bug#903999: ITP: php-doc -- Documentation for PHP] Sergio Durigan Junior
• Questions about spacet cadet reverse engineering matthias . geiger1024
  • Re: Questions about spacet cadet reverse engineering Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Questions about spacet cadet reverse engineering Roberto A. Foglietta
• About debian/patches/* licenses 野崎耕平
  • Re: About debian/patches/* licenses Paul Wise
  • Re: About debian/patches/* licenses 野崎耕平
• linuxcnc licensing issues Adam Ant
  • Re: linuxcnc licensing issues Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: linuxcnc licensing issues Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: linuxcnc licensing issues Adam Ant
• Store Wikimedia Commons picture of the day and description Patrice Coni
  • Re: Store Wikimedia Commons picture of the day and description Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Store Wikimedia Commons picture of the day and description Martin Steigerwald
  • Re: Store Wikimedia Commons picture of the day and description Stephan Verbücheln
• The 'Source' field in DEP 5 Akbarkhon Variskhanov
  • Re: The 'Source' field in DEP 5 Francesco Poli
• Fwd: License question virtualbox-ext-pack vs. virtualbox-guest-additions-iso Christian Kuka
• Black Week- bis zu 50 % Rabatt für Ihre erste Bestellung enwy
• Technical requirements for upstream license specification Marcin Owsiany
  • Re: Technical requirements for upstream license specification Michael Lustfield
  • Re: Technical requirements for upstream license specification Marcin Owsiany
• Microsoft Bing or Windows Spotlight daily picture as wallpaper? Patrice Coni
  • Re: Microsoft Bing or Windows Spotlight daily picture as wallpaper? Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: Microsoft Bing or Windows Spotlight daily picture as wallpaper? Eloi
• GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Simon McVittie
  • Re: GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Simon McVittie
  • Re: GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Roberto A. Foglietta
• Which parts do we need to open source if we use Debian on our robotics products pzk
  • Re: Which parts do we need to open source if we use Debian on our robotics products Yadd
  • Re: Which parts do we need to open source if we use Debian on our robotics products Paul Wise
• FreeBSD legacy license with restrictions on copyright notice placement Richard Fontana
  • Re: FreeBSD legacy license with restrictions on copyright notice placement Sam Hartman
  • Re: FreeBSD legacy license with restrictions on copyright notice placement Richard Fontana
• Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Samuel Henrique
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Walter Landry
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Sam Hartman
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Sam Hartman
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Florian Weimer
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Hilko Bengen
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Samuel Henrique
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Samuel Henrique
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Hilko Bengen
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
• Microsoft Public License DFSG compatibility Ben Westover
  • Re: Microsoft Public License DFSG compatibility Sam Hartman
  • Re: Microsoft Public License DFSG compatibility Sebastian Crane
  • Re: Microsoft Public License DFSG compatibility Francesco Poli
• Google verification code Google
  • Google Verification Code Google
  • Google Verification Code Google
• I need help Brandy Mckinney
• Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Paul Wise
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Walter Landry
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Walter Landry
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Steve McIntyre
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Steve McIntyre
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Paul Wise
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Paul Wise
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Stephan Verbücheln
• Need license clarification Dima Kogan
  • Re: Need license clarification Paul Wise
  • Re: Need license clarification Dima Kogan
• Expat-like license - DFSG-ok? julien . puydt
  • Re: Expat-like license - DFSG-ok? Yadd
  • Re: Expat-like license - DFSG-ok? Paul Wise
• Advice about a package fork (displaycal) Christian Marillat
  • Re: Advice about a package fork (displaycal) Francesco Poli
• Data is showing victoryschool00057
• Binary file inside fruit package Marcos Talau
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Walter Landry
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Marcos Talau
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Sebastian Crane
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Tobias Frost
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Sebastian Crane
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Sam Hartman
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Paul Wise
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Simon McVittie
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Stephan Verbücheln
• Using Debian as the base for a commercial product Дмитрий Разваров
  • Re: Using Debian as the base for a commercial product J.B. Nicholson
• a quick review of the timescaledb license Antoine Beaupré
  • Re: a quick review of the timescaledb license Antoine Beaupré
  • Re: a quick review of the timescaledb license Sebastian Crane
  • Re: a quick review of the timescaledb license Francesco Poli
• OpenLDAP d/copyright overhaul Sergio Durigan Junior
• Re: Re: Gibraltar Orange Lofton
• Re: Re: Urgent: Mirroring of encryption software in the USA Orange Lofton
• Unsere lösung für die kommenden tage 4u2move - Zusammenklappbares E-Bike
• MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? Fab Stz
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? David Given
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? Fab Stz
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? David Given
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? Paul Wise
• Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not)) Andreas Tille
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not)) Philip Hands
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not)) Francesco Poli
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Russ Allbery
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Stephan Lachnit
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Maxime Chambonnet
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Russ Allbery
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Jonathan Carter
  • Legal advice regarding the NEW queue Stephan Lachnit
  • Re: Legal advice regarding the NEW queue Jonathan Carter
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Jonathan Carter
• Bug#1004341: mercurial-common: please add contrib/zsh_completion to d/copyright Daniel Shahaf

• Earlier messages
• Later messages