debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Paul R. Tagliamonte
  • Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Santiago Vila
  • Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Tobias Frost
  • Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Roberto
  • Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Ben Finney
  • Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Florian Weimer
• Re: Bug#838414: gpick: colors.txt is non-free Elías Alejandro
  • Re: Bug#838414: gpick: colors.txt is non-free Ben Finney
  • Re: Bug#838414: gpick: colors.txt is non-free Elías Alejandro
• Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Eriberto Mota
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Ben Finney
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Ángel González
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Paul Wise
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Eriberto Mota
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Paul Wise
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Ben Finney
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Charles Plessy
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Eriberto Mota
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Florian Weimer
  • Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Paul Wise
• [no subject] Jennifer Nielsen
  • Re: your mail Steve Langasek
• Fwd: Bug#837666: udunits: license change Alastair McKinstry
  • Re: Bug#837666: Fwd: Bug#837666: udunits: license change Ben Finney
  • Re: Bug#837666: Fwd: Bug#837666: udunits: license change Francesco Poli
• EPL and GPL incompatibility George Bateman
  • Re: EPL and GPL incompatibility Ángel González
• [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Frederic Bonnard
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ole Streicher
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ian Jackson
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Frederic Bonnard
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ian Jackson
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ben Finney
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ian Jackson
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Frederic Bonnard
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Paul Wise
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Francesco Poli
  • Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ben Finney
• declaring a license Herbert Fortes
  • Re: declaring a license Ian Jackson
  • Re: declaring a license Herbert Fortes
  • Re: declaring a license Ben Finney
• Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Rafael Laboissière
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Ian Jackson
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Walter Landry
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Charles Plessy
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Rafael Laboissière
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Ben Finney
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Francesco Poli
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Ian Jackson
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Francesco Poli
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Francesco Poli
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Paul Wise
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Rafael Laboissière
  • Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Ben Finney
• transformed external sources with untouched copyright in upstream source ball Jerome BENOIT
  • Re: transformed external sources with untouched copyright in upstream source ball Ben Finney
  • Re: transformed external sources with untouched copyright in upstream source ball Paul Wise
  • Re: Re: transformed external sources with untouched copyright in upstream source ball Jerome BENOIT
• Pressage cd dvd promo distribution numérique !!! contact
• Are there any stats of reasons given for rejections of package to the Package archive ? shirish शिरीष
  • Re: Are there any stats of reasons given for rejections of package to the Package archive ? Paul Wise
  • Re: Are there any stats of reasons given for rejections of package to the Package archive ? Charles Plessy
• Re: Re: sybase license and openWatcom DFSGness Gianfranco Costamagna
  • Re: sybase license and openWatcom DFSGness Francesco Poli
• Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
  • Re: Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
  • Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
  • Re: Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
  • Re: Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
  • Re: Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
  • Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
  • Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
  • Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
  • Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
• Video Editing Software Product users list Len Rosario
• Seja um franqueado Fototica Fototica
• Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Servicos MaisReforma
  • Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Servicos MaisReforma
  • Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Servicos MaisReforma
  • Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Cotacao
  • Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Cotacao
• Dhrhd Seth Gonzales
• Dtydf Seth Gonzales
• dvbackup package Herbert Fortes
  • Re: dvbackup package Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: dvbackup package Herbert Fortes
• "Use as you wish" license Roberto
  • Re: "Use as you wish" license Ian Jackson
  • Re: "Use as you wish" license Ben Finney
  • Re: "Use as you wish" license Roberto
  • Re: "Use as you wish" license Johannes Schauer
  • Re: "Use as you wish" license Roberto
  • Re: "Use as you wish" license Ian Jackson
  • Re: "Use as you wish" license Roberto
  • Discussing legal issues of a code base, before official procedure (was: "Use as you wish" license) Ben Finney
  • Re: "Use as you wish" license Paul Wise
• sct public domain Jacob Adams
  • Re: sct public domain Ian Jackson
  • Re: sct public domain Jacob Adams
  • Re: sct public domain Ian Jackson
  • Re: sct public domain Ben Finney
  • Re: sct public domain Jacob Adams
• EADL license PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: EADL license Walter Landry
  • RE:EADL license PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: EADL license Florian Weimer
  • Re: EADL license Walter Landry
  • Re: EADL license Hendrik Weimer
• NIST data licenses/copyright PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
  • Re: NIST data licenses/copyright Ian Jackson
  • RE:NIST data licenses/copyright PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
• Oczerniają Cię w Internecie? Magdalena Cenckiewicz
• www.lists.debian.org Nicolas Grant | SunnySide Web Networks Pty Ltd
• GPL with exclusive re-licensing exception (BSD3) Debian/GNU
  • Re: GPL with exclusive re-licensing exception (BSD3) Dmitry Alexandrov
• Is possible relicense from GPL to BSD? Eriberto Mota
  • Re: Is possible relicense from GPL to BSD? Charles Plessy
  • Re: Is possible relicense from GPL to BSD? Eriberto Mota
• Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's Jan Luca Naumann
  • Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's Riley Baird
  • Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's Jan Luca Naumann
  • Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's Paul Wise
• Re: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Alexander Gerasiov
  • Re: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Vincent Cheng
  • Re: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Alexander Gerasiov
  • Re: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Tobias Frost
  • Re: Bug#826379: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Dmitry Alexandrov
• png files hpfn
  • Re: png files Ben Finney
  • Re: png files Paul Wise
  • Re: png files hpfn
• Legal issues with haskell-unix-time Dmitry Bogatov
  • Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time Paul Wise
  • Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time Eloi
  • Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time Ben Finney
  • Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time vheuser
• Re: Re: Global IP Sound iLBC Public License, v2.0 - IETF Version Kim Paflias
  • Re: Re: Global IP Sound iLBC Public License, v2.0 - IETF Version Paul R. Tagliamonte
• Votre RDV du week-end Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
  • Votre RDV du week-end Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
  • Votre RDV du week-end Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
• detail about license in duc package hpfn
  • Re: detail about license in duc package Walter Landry
  • Re: detail about license in duc package Ben Finney
  • Re: detail about license in duc package hpfn
• R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Paul R. Tagliamonte
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
  • Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Charles Plessy
• Missing license text in upstream packages Sven Bartscher
  • Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Riley Baird
  • Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Sven Bartscher
  • Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Ben Finney
  • Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Ian Jackson
  • Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Charles Plessy
  • Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Sven Bartscher
  • Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Riley Baird
  • Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Ian Jackson
• Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] [Apache 2.0] Jerome BENOIT
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] [Apache 2.0] Ben Finney
• ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? MJ Ray
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Charles Plessy
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Thorsten Alteholz
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] Jerome BENOIT
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] Ben Finney
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ian Jackson
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ian Jackson
• WOMEN'SDAY Ce vendredi au Mas Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
• libfcgi-perl copyright issue Graham Knop
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Paul Wise
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Paul Wise
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Ulrich Mueller
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Riley Baird

• Earlier messages
• Later messages