On Sun, 2021-10-17 at 13:08 +0300, Nicholas Guriev wrote: > I still have suspicions about RNNoise and its probable non-free model.
I'm the pabs3 in the HN thread you referenced. I think that RNNoise does not meet my personal standards for Free Software and also for machine learning. I think that under the Debian Deep Learning Team's Machine Learning Policy, it should be classified as a ToxicCandy Model. There isn't an official Debian position on this and there are other similar machine learning models in Debian; the threads about tesseract and Japanese text analysis come to mind for example: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[email protected] https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[email protected] > What is the current consensus on this library in Debian community? Several maintainers have added it to Debian so it seems accepted: mumble, chromium, qtwebengine-opensource-src, obs-studio > I already asked on debian-ai@ but nobody answered ever since. I suggest you bring this up again. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
