Hi Paul, On Fri, 2017-10-27 at 14:50 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > The DFSG is not a body that can approve things. You could say "DFSG > compatible", or "foo version X under license Y was approved by the > Debian ftp-masters".
Thanks for the clarification. Your comment about compatibility matches a similar comment from SPDX. If anyone has further comments I've created a specific issue about flagging SPDX license entries as DFSG compatible here: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/issues/48 Some background and suggestions for coordinated implementation details are here (for example, maintaining a simple machine-readable list): https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/issues/46 Regards, David
