Dear Debian Legal Team, Thank you very much for your help. I've read each email in this thread with care, and at last can consider this issue closed.
On 9 June 2017 at 02:27, Anthony DeRobertis <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/08/2017 06:52 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> >> >> I'd prefer not to, because Message-ID reveals what I consider private >> information (IP address or client hostname) to an unbounded audience, >> and I believe that this is a greater privacy violation than the >> lintian warning against downloading a hyperlinked image in local [...] > > > That depends on the software that generated the message (e.g., Thunderbird > seems to do uuid@domain, so avoids the privacy issue—at least it reveals > less than the From header), but where it does you could just redact the > hostname (or entire domain). That'd still preserve the ability to reference > an individual message. > > Message-Id: <localpart@...> and > Message-Id: <localpart@REDACTED> > > are both pretty clear what you're doing. > Anthony, thank you for this solution! :-) I didn't know that this was allowed. Ben, now there's a Message-ID field. I'll upload to experimental as soon as Sean Whitton grants me DM permissions for src:muse-el. Sincerely, Nicholas
