"Rebecca N. Palmer" <[email protected]> writes: > I investigated the possibility of packaging gpuocelot itself, both in > the hope that gpuocelot's authors would be more likely to agree to > fix/clarify the license for its own benefit than for beignet's, and > because "freeing CUDA" actually looked interesting (I had not > previously been aware of gpuocelot's existence), but it appears that > this is neither practical nor relevant to the license issue […]
Thank you for putting in the effort to get that far. Thank you, especially, for reporting your findings here. -- \ “[It's] best to confuse only one issue at a time.” —Brian W. | `\ Kernighan, Dennis M. Ritchie, _The C programming language_, 1988 | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
