> I would recommend the copyright holders re-release the work clearly > marked with a license grant of broad attribution-only license > conditions; the Apache Software Foundation License 2.0 > <URL:http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Apache2.0> is a good one IMO.
If they really want public domain, though, then CC-0 is good [1]. (However, it isn't OSI approved because it explicitly does not grant patent/trademark rights.) [1] https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
