On 2013-12-11, Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> wrote: > The other way round is to look at the two pieces on the right and say > that it is perfectly fine for a LGPLv2+ library to be linked against a > LGPLv3+ library without being upgraded to LGPLv3 [1], and therefore > the GPLv2 program can use it.
Let's try a different example. There is a gplv2+ library that I would love to use in a closed source application. If I then write a thin bsd-licensed library which primary purpose is to be a bsd licensed interface to the gplv2+ library, would that be fine ? Let's say: commercial app links with bsd library links with gplv2+ library. I don't think that's fine. It would also be a loophole the size of a small star in the gpl. No. I think the licensing is transitive. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
