On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:30:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Frankly speaking, "Debian's opinion" on the CC licenses does not exist. There > is the empirical observation that this or that CC license is accepted or > rejected from our archive, with both false positives and false negatives, and > there is not any document that presents logically and clearly the facts behind > the FTP team's choice of accepting version 3.0 and rejecting older versions. > > Given that the difference between the accepted and rejected license is so > thin, > I think that we can not blame people being unsatisfied in one direction or the > other and telling it repeatedly their opinion on that matter. If you do not > like this, please write a convincing and authoritative explanation of > "Debian's > opinion", that will close the debate.
Perhaps you'd be interested in helping: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/01/msg00043.html > > Cheers, > > -- > Charles Plessy > Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
