Hello. If the consensus is that GFDL 1.3 is as DFSG-compliant as it 1.2 was, then I would like to include it in common-licenses in base-files for lenny (in addition to 1.2, that is) as a "bonus".
Reasons: * The symlink GFDL is supposed to point to the latest version available. * Works under GFDL-1.2 (not "1.2 or newer") should not refer to the symlink but to the versioned license "GFDL-1.2". * It will make copyright-file compliance easier for packages in backports. No need to update base-files in backports.org just to add a new license as it happened in etch. So, if you have a strong reason why this should not be done, please speak now. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
