[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) > And the license-free graphics files. These probably have a better > claim to be "part of emacs" and under the general license than the > rest, because there's no place to put a separate license statement > in these files.
Some of these files look like C code. Can't the licence info be put in a C comment in them? Some of them like emacs.icon already have a comment. Either way, these don't seem a huge worry. > emacs.icon > emacs.xbm > gnu.xpm > gnus-pointer.xbm > gnus-pointer.xpm > gnus.pbm > gnus.xpm > letter.xbm > splash.pbm > splash.xpm > splash8.xpm -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
