[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >This sounds like "Since we have ignored this issue in the past, we must >go on forever ignoring it, even though it *is* a DFSG-freeness issue" No, this sounds like "since so far everybody but the law.kooks agreed that this is DFSG-free it's wrong to change our interpretation of the DFSG".
-- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
