On 2004-07-16 00:32:58 +0100 Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[Please keep the bug in CC for logging, as well as Eitan (upstream
author)]
Done.
[...] In other word, does the DFSG allows such thing?
I think so in letter, especially given the LPPL's definitions, but it
feels bad to obstruct people wanting to adapt the software to their
needs. It would be good if Eitan could mark distributable comments and
supply those in the source. I quite understand if he wants to keep
some messages from others to him out of the Work.
[...] I thus personnaly think that we should close
the bug...
tex4ht's copyright file appears to include an old version of the LPPL
and should be updated IMO.
Hope that helps,
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL;
Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast
