Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Matthew Garrett wrote: >> There's a strong feeling that people should be allowed to do what they >> want if it doesn't involve other people. Private undistributed >> modification falls within this. Distribution, on the other hand, >> is something that is of interest to the original developer. When >> multiple people are involved, there's a belief that they should both >> consent to what's going on. > >Not sure I understand the last sentence; when multiple people are >involved, *those people* would all consent to what's going on.
One of the people involved in distribution is the copyright holder. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
