MJ Ray wrote: >On 2004-07-13 11:14:45 +0100 Matthew Garrett ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Enforcement (or lack thereof) of a patent is arbitrary, yes. > >Needing a DFSG-free patent licence is not news to me. If we have a >patented software, then it's non-free without such a licence. Are >there other circumstances where GPL 7 offers arbitrary termination?
Any situation which inhibits your ability to carry out any of the GPL's requirements results in you no longer being able to distribute the code. I still don't see how this is any less of a practical problem for users than the copyright holder being able to terminate the license. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
