Nathaneal Nerode wrote: >If the user is really doing stuff privately -- just for himself! -- and >happens to talk about it, he certainly shouldn't be forced to distribute it >before he's ready! This is no issue at all.
Am I reading a different license here? The copy of the QPL at http://www.trolltech.com/licenses/qpl.html says: 6. You may develop application programs, reusable components and other software items that link with the original or modified versions of the Software. These items, when distributed, are subject to the following requirements: ... c. If the items are not available to the general public, and the initial developer of the Software requests a copy of the items, then you must supply one. So if the developer is just doing it for himself, then the clause doesn't apply. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
